mckinley/LinkedIn-Analytics-Dashboard
1
0 Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Audit 29/09, correct Carousel narrative, fix validation/conversion framing

Browse Source 
29/09's Carousel ("The two pillars of TXservices") is now in a fresh
export and audited: likes A1/T2 (Sabine Brock audience; Aleksandra
Kotenko, Mckinley Black team), 1 team comment, 3 team reposts ("the
usual suspects" - Aleksandra, Peter, Mckinley). Real Eng % 10.0%,
September's new growth/KPI numbers: 126->142 (+16, +12.7%).

This surfaces a real correction: July actually had 4 Carousels
(09/07, 16/07, 23/07, 30/07), not the 1 everyone's mental model had
been built around, ranging 6.0%-45.0%. Across all 6 Carousels run
this campaign (4 July + 1 August + 1 September) the format averages
25.9% Real Eng %, still the best of any format, but ranges 6.0% to
50.8% - not the clean "wins every time" story the campaign-end
summary told before this. Rewrote September's and campaign-end's
Executive Summaries throughout: the trilogy/stage narratives, the
best-posting-day findings (Tuesday's edge was never confounded by
format once September separated the variables), the recommendations
(pair Carousel with a named claim instead of trusting the format
alone, test the untried Carousel+pain-point combination).

Also fixed a conflation Mckinley flagged directly: July's poll (a
genuine validation test - does this audience respond to an
interactive format at all) and 17/09's pilot-partner ask (a direct
conversion CTA) are different kinds of things and were wrongly
grouped under one "validation" framing in both September's and the
campaign-end's summaries - now described as what they actually are.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
beantownbabeandClaude Sonnet 5 committed 2026-10-02 11:25:01 +02:00
1 parent 5bf0b6fdd8
commit 0e26e85b02
3 files changed
+111 -75
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

No files matched your search

assets/follower_directory.html
+1 -1
View File
@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ header.hero p.sub { color: var(--text-secondary); font-size: 0.95rem; line-heigh
</div>
<script>
const DATA = [{"name": "Tamadur AlBaraghtheh", "connection": "1st", "position": "Researcher", "company": "Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Geesthacht (near Hamburg)", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Researcher/Scientist (non-postdoc)", "function": "Research/Science", "sector": "Academia/Research Institute", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamadur-albaraghtheh-3380ba7a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "IC — Junior / Specialist", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Research/Science", "industry": "Research & Collaborations", "industryOther": ""}, {"name": "Alexej Kotelnikov", "connection": "3rd", "position": "Senior KAM & BD (Automotive/Tech/Industrial)", "company": "Bosch Automotive Service Solutions GmbH", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Plochingen (near Stuttgart)", "personalLocation": "Greater Munich Metropolitan Area", "seniority": "Senior IC/Lead", "function": "Business Development/Sales", "sector": "Other named company", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexej-kotelnikov-10013a5a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "IC — Senior / Lead / Principal", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Business Development/Sales", "industry": "Other", "industryOther": "Automotive Service & Diagnostics Equipment"}, {"name": "Katrin Boeke-Purkis", "connection": "3rd", "position": "Regulatory Post Market Compliance Coordinator", "company": "Intuitive Surgical", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "United States", "city": "Sunnyvale, California (HQ)", "personalLocation": "Sunnyvale, California, United States", "seniority": "Manager/Coordinator", "function": "Regulatory/Compliance", "sector": "Medical/Life Sciences", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/katrin-boeke-purkis-5722888/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "IC — Junior / Specialist", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Regulatory/Compliance", "industry": "Other", "industryOther": "Medical/Life Sciences"}, {"name": "Timo Christian", "connection": "2nd", "position": "Program Manager", "company": "Impossible Founders and DESY", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Hamburg", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Manager/Coordinator", "function": "Marketing/Comms/Ops", "sector": "Academia/Research Institute", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/timo-christian/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "engagement_notes": "Liked 16/07 post.", "roleLevel": "Manager", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Marketing/Comms/Ops", "industry": "Research & Collaborations", "industryOther": ""}, {"name": "Jan-Christian Schober", "connection": "3rd", "position": "Student", "company": "University of Hamburg", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Hamburg", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Student/Trainee", "function": "Student/Academic Track", "sector": "Academia/Research Institute", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-christian-schober-78b72926a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "Student", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Student/Academic Track", "industry": "Academia", "industryOther": ""}, {"name": "Benedikt Kubicki", "connection": "2nd", "position": "SAP-Berater", "company": "SI PRO GmbH", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Mannheim (HQ); has a Hamburg office", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Manager/Coordinator", "function": "Engineering/Technical", "sector": "Other named company", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/benedikt-kubicki-31652b25a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "engagement_notes": "Commented on 09/07 post; liked 15/09 — repeat engager.", "roleLevel": "IC — Junior / Specialist", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Engineering/Technical", "industry": "Other", "industrLine truncated
const DATA = [{"name": "Tamadur AlBaraghtheh", "connection": "1st", "position": "Researcher", "company": "Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Geesthacht (near Hamburg)", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Researcher/Scientist (non-postdoc)", "function": "Research/Science", "sector": "Academia/Research Institute", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/tamadur-albaraghtheh-3380ba7a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "IC — Junior / Specialist", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Research/Science", "industry": "Research & Collaborations", "industryOther": ""}, {"name": "Alexej Kotelnikov", "connection": "3rd", "position": "Senior KAM & BD (Automotive/Tech/Industrial)", "company": "Bosch Automotive Service Solutions GmbH", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Plochingen (near Stuttgart)", "personalLocation": "Greater Munich Metropolitan Area", "seniority": "Senior IC/Lead", "function": "Business Development/Sales", "sector": "Other named company", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/alexej-kotelnikov-10013a5a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "IC — Senior / Lead / Principal", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Business Development/Sales", "industry": "Other", "industryOther": "Automotive Service & Diagnostics Equipment"}, {"name": "Katrin Boeke-Purkis", "connection": "3rd", "position": "Regulatory Post Market Compliance Coordinator", "company": "Intuitive Surgical", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "United States", "city": "Sunnyvale, California (HQ)", "personalLocation": "Sunnyvale, California, United States", "seniority": "Manager/Coordinator", "function": "Regulatory/Compliance", "sector": "Medical/Life Sciences", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/katrin-boeke-purkis-5722888/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "IC — Junior / Specialist", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Regulatory/Compliance", "industry": "Other", "industryOther": "Medical/Life Sciences"}, {"name": "Timo Christian", "connection": "2nd", "position": "Program Manager", "company": "Impossible Founders and DESY", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Hamburg", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Manager/Coordinator", "function": "Marketing/Comms/Ops", "sector": "Academia/Research Institute", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/timo-christian/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "engagement_notes": "Liked 16/07 post.", "roleLevel": "Manager", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Marketing/Comms/Ops", "industry": "Research & Collaborations", "industryOther": ""}, {"name": "Jan-Christian Schober", "connection": "3rd", "position": "Student", "company": "University of Hamburg", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Hamburg", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Student/Trainee", "function": "Student/Academic Track", "sector": "Academia/Research Institute", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/jan-christian-schober-78b72926a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "roleLevel": "Student", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Student/Academic Track", "industry": "Academia", "industryOther": ""}, {"name": "Benedikt Kubicki", "connection": "2nd", "position": "SAP-Berater", "company": "SI PRO GmbH", "followed": "July 2026", "followedSort": "2026-07", "country": "Germany", "city": "Mannheim (HQ); has a Hamburg office", "personalLocation": "Hamburg, Germany", "seniority": "Manager/Coordinator", "function": "Engineering/Technical", "sector": "Other named company", "outreach_status": "Not Contacted", "outreach_log": [], "connection_at_outreach": "", "is_valuable": false, "has_responded": false, "email": "", "linkedin_url": "https://www.linkedin.com/in/benedikt-kubicki-31652b25a/", "is_team": false, "company_website": "", "engagement_notes": "Commented on 09/07 post; liked 15/09 — repeat engager.", "roleLevel": "IC — Junior / Specialist", "roleLevelNote": "", "department": "Engineering/Technical", "industry": "Other", "industrLine truncated
const SECTOR_COLORS = {
'Academia/Research Institute': 'var(--series-1)',
engagement_audit.py
+7
View File
@@ -170,6 +170,13 @@ AUDIENCE_TEAM_AUDIT = {
"reposts": {"audience": 0, "team": 3}, # Mckinley Black, Peter Gaal, Aleksandra Kotenko are Team
# (all internal)
},
"29/09": {
"likes": {"audience": 1, "team": 2}, # Sabine Brock is Audience; Aleksandra Kotenko, Mckinley
# Black are Team; TXproducts Page like excluded entirely
"comments": {"audience": 0, "team": 1}, # Mckinley Black's own comment is Team, excluded from audience
"reposts": {"audience": 0, "team": 3}, # Aleksandra Kotenko, Peter Gaal, Mckinley Black are Team
# (all internal, "the usual suspects")
},
}
monthly_report_notes.py
+103 -74
View File
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ NOTES = {
"goal_line": "September's Campaign: Stage Three: Find the Trigger - What "
"made people act — reactions, reposts, and new connections.",
"goal_met": "Partial",
"growth_note": "Page grew from 126 to 140 followers (+14, +11.1%), the "
"growth_note": "Page grew from 126 to 142 followers (+16, +12.7%), the "
"slowest month of the campaign so far (July +25.9%, "
"August +17.8%).",
"engagement_question": "What actually triggered real engagement, not "
@@ -306,18 +306,20 @@ NOTES = {
"08/09 ('Power electronics fail because materials change under "
"stress') was the only post this month with genuine back-and-forth "
"comments, a real discussion thread, and the month's highest Real "
"Eng % (18.75%).",
"That 18.75% ceiling is the lowest 'best post' of the campaign so "
"Eng % (19.2%).",
"That 19.2% ceiling is the lowest 'best post' of the campaign so "
"far (July 45.0%, August 50.8%), and the month's own average "
"(12.2%) is roughly half August's (20.0%) — whatever triggered "
"(12.8%) is roughly half August's (20.0%) — whatever triggered "
"08/09's discussion didn't repeat.",
"No Carousels this month at all (all 5 posts were Text/Image) — "
"the one format proven to outperform in both July and August was "
"never tried in September.",
"The month's Carousel (29/09) finally ran, and did NOT repeat "
"July/August's winning pattern — it scored 10.0%, below even "
"17/09's and 22/09's plain Text/Image posts, and nowhere near "
"July's 45.0% or August's 50.8%. Carousel is not a guaranteed "
"win; whatever made it work before didn't carry over here.",
],
"trilogy_intro": "September's five posts don't form a single arc like "
"trilogy_intro": "September's six posts don't form a single arc like "
"July's trilogy or August's TXServices launch — "
"they're five different jobs done in five different "
"they're six different jobs done in six different "
"posts:",
"trilogy_posts": [
"03/09 — announces SNIB2026 attendance (event promo)",
@@ -326,23 +328,31 @@ NOTES = {
"15/09 — recaps SNIB2026 after the fact",
"17/09 — a direct ask for pilot partners",
"22/09 — a team photo (#MeetTheTeam)",
"29/09 — 'The two pillars of TXservices' (Carousel), the "
"month's one format test — and its lowest-scoring post",
],
"trilogy_closing": "Only the pain-point post (08/09) generated real "
"comments; the two conference posts, the direct "
"ask, and the team photo all landed in the same "
"flat 5-8% range — a trigger was found once, not "
"built into a repeatable pattern.",
"best_posting_day_note": "Best Posting Day: Tuesday averaged 11.0% "
"Real Eng % vs. Thursday's 5.0%.",
"best_posting_day_caveat": "Note: unlike July and August, this gap "
"isn't confounded by format — every "
"September post was Text/Image, so this is "
"a cleaner day signal, even as the month "
"lost the chance to re-test Carousel.",
"comments; everything else, including the "
"Carousel, landed flat — a trigger was found "
"once, not built into a repeatable pattern, and "
"the one format lever that worked twice before "
"didn't work a third time.",
"best_posting_day_note": "Best Posting Day: Tuesday averaged 10.9% "
"Real Eng % vs. Thursday's 6.4%.",
"best_posting_day_caveat": "Note: this month actually separates the "
"two variables for the first time — "
"Tuesday had both the campaign's weakest "
"Carousel (29/09, 10.0%) and its best "
"post (08/09, 19.2%), so the day itself "
"isn't doing the work; the specific post "
"still is.",
"validation_gap": "17/09's direct pilot-partner ask, the clearest "
"call-to-action of the campaign, underperformed "
"(5.0%) — asking directly didn't work better than "
"anything else this month.",
"conversion CTA of the campaign, underperformed "
"(8.0%) — this isn't a validation test like "
"July's poll (that's about whether the audience "
"responds to a format at all), it's a direct "
"business ask, and a plain pain-point post still "
"beat it by more than double.",
"audience_composition_line": "AUDIENCE COMPOSITION: Academia/Research "
"Institute still leads (10 of 17), but "
"seniority spread out — Engineer/"
@@ -361,9 +371,9 @@ NOTES = {
"budget-holding presence, a different decision context than "
"July/August's mostly non-budget-holding cohort."),
("Trust and Reservations", "08/09's pain-point framing, not a "
"product pitch, is what earned the month's only real "
"conversation — naming a real problem built more trust than the "
"direct ask on 17/09 did."),
"product pitch or a format choice, is what earned the month's "
"only real conversation — naming a real problem beat both the "
"direct ask (17/09) and the Carousel (29/09)."),
],
},
"core_message_abstract": _CORE_MESSAGE_ABSTRACT,
@@ -377,56 +387,68 @@ NOTES = {
"goal_line": "3-Month Campaign: Find the Voice (July) -> Find the "
"Audience (August) -> Find the Trigger (September).",
"goal_met": "Partial",
"growth_note": "Page grew from 85 to 140 followers (+55, +64.7% "
"growth_note": "Page grew from 85 to 142 followers (+57, +67.1% "
"cumulative) — but the monthly pace decelerated every "
"single month (July +25.9%, August +17.8%, September "
"+11.1%).",
"+12.7%).",
"engagement_question": "What did the campaign actually prove, stage "
"by stage?",
"engagement_findings": [
"Carousel won decisively both times it was tried (09/07: 45.0%, "
"04/08: 50.8%) — then was never tried again in September, the one "
"proven lever sitting unused by month 3.",
"Carousel ran 6 times across the whole campaign (4 in July, 1 "
"each in August/September) and averages 25.9% Real Eng %, the "
"best of any format — but with a wide range (6.0% to 50.8%), not "
"a guaranteed result. Text/Image averages 12.4% but has its own "
"wide range (2.0% to 48.7%, driven by one strong post) — a "
"weak Carousel and a strong Text/Image post can land in the "
"same place.",
"The same audience showed up every month: Academia/Research "
"Institute, Germany-based, Researcher/Scientist-heavy in July, "
"August, and September alike.",
"August, and September alike — the campaign's one genuinely "
"stable finding.",
"A real trigger was found once (September's 08/09 pain-point "
"post, the only genuine discussion thread of the whole campaign) "
"but never repeated or turned into a system.",
"post, the only genuine discussion thread of the whole campaign, "
"and still the highest Real Eng % of the month even against the "
"month's own Carousel) but never repeated or turned into a "
"system.",
],
"trilogy_intro": "Three stages, three different kinds of answer:",
"trilogy_posts": [
"July — Find the Voice: a clear tone/format winner (Carousel + "
"personal, emotional-register storytelling, the 14/07-28/07-30/07 "
"trilogy)",
"July — Find the Voice: Carousel's best average format (4 posts, "
"6.0%-45.0%), plus the 14/07-28/07-30/07 personal-voice trilogy",
"August — Find the Audience: a clear demographic answer "
"(Academia/Research, Germany, Researcher/Scientist), plus a "
"6-post TXServices product launch arc",
"(Academia/Research, Germany, Researcher/Scientist), the "
"6-post TXServices launch arc, and Carousel's single best post "
"of the campaign (50.8%)",
"September — Find the Trigger: one real trigger found (08/09's "
"pain-point post), but not repeated — growth and engagement both "
"decelerated",
"pain-point post, beating even the month's own Carousel, 10.0%), "
"but not repeated — growth and engagement both decelerated",
],
"trilogy_closing": "Each stage answered its own question, but the "
"campaign never closed the loop — the two things "
"July and August both proved (Carousel format, a "
"receptive technical audience) were never combined "
"with September's one real trigger (naming a "
"concrete pain point) into a single, repeatable "
"post.",
"best_posting_day_note": "Best Posting Day: Tuesday won 2 of 3 months "
"(August, September); July was the only "
"Thursday-best month.",
"best_posting_day_caveat": "Note: every month's day finding is "
"confounded by which format happened to "
"run that day — a pattern flagged in July "
"and never fully resolved across the whole "
"campaign.",
"validation_gap": "Every direct validation attempt underperformed: "
"the 21/07 poll got zero responses, the 17/09 "
"pilot-partner ask got 5.0% — asking this audience "
"directly, by poll or by CTA, never once "
"outperformed organic storytelling or a named "
"pain point.",
"campaign never closed the loop — a concrete, "
"named pain point (September's real finding) was "
"never tried inside a Carousel (July/August's "
"format finding), so the one combination that "
"might stack both wins was never actually tested.",
"best_posting_day_note": "Best Posting Day: Tuesday won in August and "
"September; July's Thursday win was itself "
"Carousel-driven (every July Carousel ran "
"on a Thursday), not a real day effect.",
"best_posting_day_caveat": "Note: September finally separated the "
"two variables (Tuesday held both the "
"campaign's weakest Carousel and its best "
"post) — the day was never what mattered, "
"the specific post always was. July and "
"August's day findings were confounded by "
"format and should be read with that in "
"mind.",
"validation_gap": "Two different kinds of direct ask both "
"underperformed: the 21/07 poll (a genuine "
"validation test — does this audience respond to "
"an interactive format at all) got zero "
"responses, and the 17/09 pilot-partner ask (a "
"direct conversion CTA, a different kind of ask "
"entirely) got 8.0% — both lost to organic "
"storytelling or a named pain point every time.",
"audience_composition_line": "AUDIENCE COMPOSITION (campaign-wide): "
"Academia/Research Institute and "
"Germany dominate in every single month "
@@ -437,23 +459,34 @@ NOTES = {
"Research Institute, Germany-based, Researcher/Scientist-heavy "
"in July, August, and September alike — whatever comes next can "
"target this cohort with confidence."),
("What Worked", "Carousel format (2 for 2 when tried) and "
"specific, concrete claims (a cost number in August, a named "
"pain point in September) outperformed everything else — vague "
"or feature-list content consistently sat in the 2-8% range."),
("What Worked (on average)", "Carousel averaged best across all "
"6 times it ran (25.9%), but ranged from 6.0% to 50.8% — not a "
"guaranteed result. A specific, concrete claim (a cost number "
"in August, a named pain point in September) beat vague or "
"feature-list content every single time it was tried — the "
"claim mattered at least as much as the format."),
("What Didn't", "Direct asks (the poll, the pilot-partner CTA) "
"underperformed every time they were tried, across all 3 "
"months — this audience responds to a story or a stated "
"problem, not a request."),
],
"recommendations": [
"Bring Carousel back as the default format, not an occasional "
"one-off — it won decisively both times it ran (45.0%, 50.8%) "
"and then sat unused for all of September.",
"Don't treat Carousel as an automatic win — across all 6 times "
"it ran it averaged best (25.9%) but ranged from 6.0% to 50.8%. "
"Keep using it as the default format, but pair it with a "
"specific, named claim (the thing that beat everything else "
"every time it was tried) instead of relying on the format "
"alone to carry a post.",
"Lead posts with a named, specific pain point (like 08/09's "
"'materials change under stress') instead of a feature list or "
"a general announcement — it's the only format this audience has "
"actually stopped to discuss, not just liked.",
"a general announcement — it's the only approach that's beaten "
"everything else, including Carousel, every time it's been "
"tried.",
"Test the untried combination: a Carousel built around a named "
"pain point, not a product/feature frame — Carousel's own best "
"posts (August's 50.8%, July's 45.0%) and September's trigger "
"finding (08/09's pain point) have never been combined in one "
"post.",
"Move the 'ask' out of the public post and into direct outreach: "
"every public CTA tried (poll, pilot-partner request) "
"underperformed, but 21 people who engaged with a post without "
@@ -465,10 +498,6 @@ NOTES = {
"became a pilot partner or a meeting — October needs its own "
"metric for that (e.g. DM replies, calls booked, pilot sign-ups) "
"since Real Eng % only measures attention, not outcome.",
"Keep testing Tuesday vs. Thursday, but pair it with a *fixed* "
"format next time (e.g. two Carousels, one each day) so the day "
"effect and the format effect can finally be told apart — every "
"month so far has confounded the two.",
"The audience itself hasn't moved in 3 months (Academia/"
"Research, Germany, Researcher/Scientist) — October doesn't need "
"a new audience-discovery push, it needs content built "