Fix August's poll finding: zero real response, not "a small improvement"

Found while cross-checking the user's own annotated PDF copies on
their Desktop against the live data. August's 06/08 Poll was recorded
as "a small but real response (5.2%)" in the executive summary, but
the actual audit (engagement_audit.py's own "06/08" entry, unchanged
since it was first audited) already had zero audience AND zero team
engagement from Likes/Comments/Reposts - the 5.2% was entirely
unaudited Clicks, unrelated to anyone actually engaging with the poll
itself. The real finding: both poll attempts (21/07, 06/08) got zero
genuine follower response, not an improvement month to month, and the
Poll/Wildcard format was removed from the campaign after the second
attempt - a real decision this file wasn't recording anywhere.

Fixed in August's own executive_summary and in the campaign-end
summary, which was missing August's poll attempt from its validation
narrative entirely (only mentioned July's).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
beantownbabeandClaude Sonnet 5 committed 2026-10-02 12:01:48 +02:00
1 parent 0e26e85b02
commit e11773f9b8
1 file changed
+19 -12
+19 -12
View File
@@ -211,10 +211,15 @@ NOTES = {
"averaged higher (13.3% vs 15.4%), the same "
"format/day confound flagged in July, still "
"unresolved.",
"validation_gap": "The Poll (06/08) got a small but real response "
"(5.2%), an improvement on July's zero-response "
"poll, but still far below every other format — "
"not yet a validated channel.",
"validation_gap": "The second Poll attempt (06/08) got zero real "
"follower responses, same as July's — the only "
"reaction and comment were the Page's own, and "
"the only vote was internal (Daniel). The 5.2% "
"Real Eng % figure is entirely unaudited Clicks, "
"not engagement with the poll itself. Decision: "
"the Poll/Wildcard format is removed from the "
"campaign after two straight zero-response "
"attempts.",
"audience_composition_line": "AUDIENCE COMPOSITION: Academia/Research "
"Institute and Germany both dominate more "
"heavily than in July — the audience is "
@@ -441,14 +446,16 @@ NOTES = {
"August's day findings were confounded by "
"format and should be read with that in "
"mind.",
"validation_gap": "Two different kinds of direct ask both "
"underperformed: the 21/07 poll (a genuine "
"validation test — does this audience respond to "
"an interactive format at all) got zero "
"responses, and the 17/09 pilot-partner ask (a "
"direct conversion CTA, a different kind of ask "
"entirely) got 8.0% — both lost to organic "
"storytelling or a named pain point every time.",
"validation_gap": "The Poll format was tried twice as a validation "
"test (21/07, 06/08) — does this audience respond "
"to an interactive format at all — and got zero "
"real follower responses both times (06/08's only "
"vote was internal). The format was removed from "
"the campaign after the second attempt. Separately, "
"17/09's pilot-partner ask (a direct conversion "
"CTA, not a validation test) got 8.0% — both kinds "
"of direct ask lost to organic storytelling or a "
"named pain point every time.",
"audience_composition_line": "AUDIENCE COMPOSITION (campaign-wide): "
"Academia/Research Institute and "
"Germany dominate in every single month "